|
Author
|
Topic: antics
|
rnelson
Member
|
posted 10-01-2007 01:39 PM
  
For anyone who hasn't been watching the show. ..The guns are quiet at anti. George lurks like a buzzard, but says nothing. Three of the four logged in users are polygraph examiners. Ha. That has got to chafe. Its like a Mexican-standoff. They are all staring at each other, waiting for someone to twitch. Reminds me of the end of The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly. r ------------------
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room."
--(Stanley Kubrick/Peter Sellers - Dr. Strangelove, 1964)
[This message has been edited by rnelson (edited 10-01-2007).] IP: Logged |
stat
Member
|
posted 10-01-2007 02:40 PM
....and so that is the way it should be. When a scandal breaks, why should nonombre and liebabycrybaby have to bare the brunt of the feeding frenzy all by themselves. There is no reason why there shouldn't be an army of examiners as dorment members lying in the wait for just such an occasion---or the recent case of documented sworn allegation that Drew Richardson (we've nicknamed him Drewie like "Brownie")was a poor performer at DODPI. I would just like to thank the members here for their selfless dedication to our field----and their wicked barbs toward those that don't believe that what we do is worthwhile nor effective. We shall keep our memberships with the anti-group and be prepared to dispatch our disinformation counterparts swiftly and with heart. We will call ourselves;
The Kymo Brigade IP: Logged |
rnelson
Member
|
posted 10-01-2007 03:26 PM
What a show.------------------
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room."
--(Stanley Kubrick/Peter Sellers - Dr. Strangelove, 1964)
IP: Logged |
Barry C
Member
|
posted 10-01-2007 07:38 PM
I checked in to catch-up, but I was there a while. Couldn't you all make it a little tougher to figure out who's who? I like a good mystery. IP: Logged |
Ted Todd
Member
|
posted 10-01-2007 09:33 PM
George has taken a severe beating the past few weeks on his site. He is also laying very low. He is either out of town, dead, or building a dirty bomb.We may have awakened a sleeping giant here. I may just be paranoid but I would expecting an incoming Scud at any time. Ted IP: Logged |
rnelson
Member
|
posted 10-01-2007 10:54 PM
I tried a pair of groucho marx glasses, but to no success.------------------
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room."
--(Stanley Kubrick/Peter Sellers - Dr. Strangelove, 1964)
[This message has been edited by rnelson (edited 10-02-2007).] IP: Logged |
stat
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 07:16 AM
George is busy researching everything he has written about Drew in the last 7 years (teehee) and he is busy writing emails to his minions to inform them that his site is under seige, Expect some older posters to reemerge, and he is trying to expedite the FIA on Sam Braddock's military career, and others. Also, in a private message George told me to be careful with my words regarding Drew's credibility or I might get sued--I retorted that he shares the chain of libelous liability as the host----he disagreed.....he is wrong as when I researched internet law when I was wanting to start my own poly board (before joining here) I learned of the host' liability-----regardless-----I have been very cautious. So, he is also researching liability chains regarding internet message boards (he is a bean counter and can easily be dispatched with "homework.")
Regardless, George isn't constructing a dirty bomb, he is trying on helmets and kevlar vests.[This message has been edited by stat (edited 10-02-2007).] IP: Logged |
Barry C
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 08:24 AM
I don't know what the law is where he is, but I think it's torts 101 that he, as one who can pull the plug on what's up there, can be held liable for, well, libel.IP: Logged |
stat
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 09:14 AM
My only apprehension is that George may, if his message board were overrun by aggresive examiners, pull the plug on the board altogether. This is unlikely due to his narcissism and need for celebrity.IP: Logged |
stat
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 11:31 AM
In the quest to further the "Kymo Brigade" agenda of "swift-boating" George, if there is anyone who has information regarding George that until now, you had no tangible use for....now is the time to purge. Please contact either Taylor or RNelson by email via their profiles, who will then forward the info to me, as I prefer my anonymity. Thanks all!
stat[This message has been edited by stat (edited 10-02-2007).] IP: Logged |
Ted Todd
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 02:58 PM
Call me stupid but something is very much missing from this Bio. If I had been the "FBI's Top Polygraph Expert" I would certainly want to include that in my Bio-wouldn't you? In fact, there is no reference to any polygraph experience in this Bio at all.
www.brainwavescience.com/Drewbio.php Ted IP: Logged |
Taylor
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 03:11 PM
Ted - good find. Any other info - send to quest4truth@msn.com or raymond@raymondnelson.us Now is the time! IP: Logged |
stat
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 03:27 PM
I have scoured the anti-archives for key players (George,Eos,Digithead) who have bad- mouthed p300 fMRI technologies. I can't find anything other than an occasion of negativity regarding any sort of mental intrusion with technologies----nothing damning. What does a guy have to do to get Georgies FBI/LAPD file? I suppose I am just dreaming. I had a business relationship with a PI firm in Germany for a spell, I wonder .......nah.IP: Logged |
Ted Todd
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 03:31 PM
OKNow this is killing me! When you go to the above referenced site, check out Dr. Drew's side kick, Dr. Farwell. His Karate photo is a MUST SEE! Ted IP: Logged |
stat
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 03:44 PM
Ya gotta admit, that firm looks like a great gig with lot$ of potential.I have associates who have been shopping MRI's for a while---they are suprisingly cheap (35k- and up for Phillips Med Systems and GE used/rebuilt), but the "tubes" which need constant replacing are very pricey. The newer models are so powerful that mtce/repair technologists are claiming intense feelings of nausea and depression after being around just the dorment magnets.
What I have yet to understand is how they are able to use any sort of monitor to show stimulus to examinees which don't contain some sort of metal---unless they designed some sort of projection unit.[This message has been edited by stat (edited 10-02-2007).] IP: Logged |
rnelson
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 04:54 PM
now that is a photoshop opp.IP: Logged |
rnelson
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 04:55 PM
After a whole day of work in the trenches, it just seems therapeutic to make fun of people who take themselves seriously.
http://www.raymondnelson.us/images/KFuBarney.jpg [This message has been edited by rnelson (edited 10-02-2007).] IP: Logged |
stat
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 07:33 PM
very nice.IP: Logged |
chaz
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 07:56 PM
What does this George do for a living besides the anti poly site?
Has any professional Physco analized him?
Is it normal to dedicate so much time so negatively for so long?
He failed his FBI test- he should get over it and do something else. How long ago was that now?
Well..at least he didnt get a firearm and do something physically drastic when he failed that poly- like we hear postal workers do in the USA (and other places)IP: Logged |
Ted Todd
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 08:02 PM
Chaz,Watch the five o'clock news. Ted IP: Logged |
Ted Todd
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 08:21 PM
Ray and Stat,I am presently the only guy in my agency doing polygraphs. I figure by default, that makes me the "Top Polygraph Expert" in my agency. I have also done a lot of research lately on George and Drew. I figure by default, that makes me a "Polygraph Researcher". My question is this; If I post this on my resume, are the two of you going to kick my ass and put pictures of Barney on my web-site? Ted IP: Logged |
rnelson
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 09:16 PM
We'd do that anyway.Where's yer website? ------------------
"Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room."
--(Stanley Kubrick/Peter Sellers - Dr. Strangelove, 1964)
IP: Logged |
Ted Todd
Member
|
posted 10-02-2007 09:48 PM
I ain't sayin'Niters Ted IP: Logged |
chaz
Member
|
posted 10-04-2007 11:56 AM
Ted,What do you mean watch the 5 oclock news..did Stat shoot george or something?? IP: Logged |
LouRovner
Administrator
|
posted 10-04-2007 10:17 PM
Stat, Ray, et al,Charlie Daniels gave a presentation at APA a couple of years ago. Among other things, he mentioned Farwell (of Brain Fingerprinting) misrepresenting his own CV in court (for example, he represented himself as having been a professor at Harvard - he wasn't). As you may know, Drewie is part of the Brain Fingerprinting gang. He sure isn't very selective about picking his friends. Or maybe he just can't find any higher-quality friends.
I can't decide which name is cheesier: Brain Fingerprinting or Antipolygraph.org.
Lou
IP: Logged |
J.B. McCloughan
Administrator
|
posted 10-04-2007 11:57 PM
Lou,Did Charlie bring his band? If you talk to him, tell him I have seen his brother Jack quite a bit of late. All, I know there have been some complaints about stagnancy of the field, so I was thinking maybe we could change some of the nomenclature a bit? To start, instead of calling the instrument a lie detector or polygraph we could call it a body cavity searcher. However, this might not work for EDA, so we could call that component the palm reader.
[This message has been edited by J.B. McCloughan (edited 10-04-2007).] IP: Logged |
rnelson
Member
|
posted 10-05-2007 09:34 AM
Can someone email JB some Alka Seltzer? He might need it his morning.---------- Thanks Lou. ---------- Ludovico has been under some PM fire for all the name calling and sarcasm, and for photoshop/GIMP animating Lethe's avatar image with some drag queen pics. IP: Logged |
Taylor
Member
|
posted 10-05-2007 09:23 PM
On the anti site they are talking about:
*
I just saw an advertisement for a feature on tomorrow's edition of Fox 5 News (New York area) which puports to "debunk" the polygraph. Fox 5 news is usually pretty sensationalist, but the advertisement claimed to "put the test to the test" -- it could be interesting. I would catch, record, and YouTube the feature if I could, but unfortunately will be stuck in the office. If anyone catches it, I would appreciate if they could upload for our collective benefit.
*
Gino piped in with:
I caught it. It couldn't have been more like propaganda if the APA had written the script.
Although a screen shot of the AntiPolygraph.org homepage is shown, the only countermeasue that the mark uses is to "believe in [his] head that all questions are the same."
Both the examinee and the reporter appear to have no clue whatsoever about polygraphy. The reporter goes on and on about how the lie was detected while pointing out a significant response to a sacrifice relevant question.
I will write more on this later.
*
This will be a good opportunity for all to watch and send comments to Ray or I so we can send it to Stat to get your comments out. Actually, if this program is in our favor it would be a great opportunity for all of us to log on separately and bombard the site.
IP: Logged |
Polygraph Place Bulletin Board
